|
|
Another Dimension
|
May 2017
Title: The Moon and the Other
Author: John Kessel
Publisher: Saga Press
In
John Kessel’s new novel, the Moon of 2149 hosts twenty-seven
different colonies that support 3.2 million people. Each colony is
principled on different political and social values, but bound to the
whole through complex economic trade and scientific
interdependencies. AIs are commonplace, as is genetic engineering,
potent anti-aging tech, nano-solutions to a variety of problems, and
even, though frowned upon in some quarters, uplifted animals, such as
dogs and monkeys. And of course, all of the engineering and
sustainability innovations that make long-term existence within Moon
domes possible.
In
this tale of two colonies, Persepolis and the Society of Cousins, we
follow the complex and subtly interwoven stories of four main
characters: Erno, Mira, Carey and Amestris. For long stretches of the
book, these four threads resolve into two, with the four characters
above entangled in romantic relationships, but we remain privy to
four distinct points of view throughout, which makes for fascinating
reading. The plots are propelled forward by the protagonists’
various ambitions: seeking economic improvement, assuming parental
responsibility for a teenaged boy, rebelling against a wealthy
patriarch, atoning for past sins, and so on and so forth. Persepolis,
the Moon’s largest, most populous colony, where status rises
with depth, is also its richest; founded by utopians harkening back
to a pre-Islam Iran, it is organized around a secular government and
boasts immense luxury as well as painful socio-economic
stratification. Meanwhile, Fowler’s Society of Cousins is a
more radical experiment in matriarchal empowerment, adhering to a
completely different set of mores wherein status and comfort flow
from assumed gender roles rather than purchasing power. But within
each of these colonies various sub-factions work to interrogate and
test the stability of their adopted models. The Society of Cousins,
in particular, is subjected to great stress at the hands of
Persepolis and a greater coalition, and the possibilities of
terrorism and revolution loom ever-near. Kessel has discussed
how the Society of Cousins is modeled after the social protocols of
bonobos, where sex is common coin and females band together to
prevent male domination, while Persepolis is modeled after the more
familiar society of chimps. The clash between these two systems is
inherently compelling, but Kessel skillfully delves beyond the
obvious and explores nuances of all sorts. By concretely illustrating
the challenges and deviations from their ideals, Kessel makes his
colonies fully believable.
The
book is rich with incident, but even richer in sophisticated
characterization, sumptuous literary allusion, political discourse,
and an almost invisible but consistent grounding in scientific
plausibility (with one significant leap towards the story’s
explosive denouement). Kessel’s scientific extrapolations
permeate the novel’s backdrop with exquisitely sustained
thoughtfulness and rigor. Yet in many ways, this is a novel of
manners, and part of its beauty is the way it artfully balances both
sides of any given equation. One of the novel’s main themes is
that of finding one’s place and attempting to understand the
Other. Gender questions contribute significantly. What are
masculinity and manliness in a post-feminist world? “The idea
that gender is entirely a construction was demolished a century ago,”
says one character. “No matter how it expresses, it’s in
our genes. To deny the reality of the billions who devoted their
lives to being ‘male’ or ‘female’ is
inhumane. Are men and women myths?” Another asks: “What
is a man? Is a man just a woman who can’t bear children? I
think our answers to these questions have been impoverished.”
No matter what side you fall on, gender relations will always be
tricky, because, as we’re told early on, “Difference
means persecution. Always true, anywhere you go.” The Other
also manifests in the truly non-human intelligences of those uplifted
animals I mentioned before. One of them, a canine reporter named
Sirius, plays a central role. Time and again caution is heeded
regarding assumptions: “The more Erno had gotten to know the
dog, the less he understood him.”
Another
major theme, closely connected to the first, is communication. When
the novel kicks off with Erno in exile, he reflects on the importance
of language: “Each shift enlarged his hoard of workplace
idioms, of terms necessary to carry on a political conversation, of
pickup lines—even of ways to express his feelings.”
Later, he muses that, “Poetry was all he had.” Balancing
this, the limitations of conventional narrative are addressed in at
least two ways: by using non-traditional narrative means (such as
poetry fragments, song lyrics, report extracts, forum board messages,
and video interviews) to convey information to the reader, and by
explicitly addressing the distortions of fiction in the novel’s
wistful closing chapter. Connected to all this is the way the media
generally exploits its audience: “The news lives on feeding
viewers’ paranoia.” We also get compelling debate around
the importance of transparency pertaining to scientific research,
another fundamental way of communicating. And of course the novel’s
erotic interludes and sexual escapades are fundamentally about
attempting to connect (or manipulate) someone else, and are never
simplified for our benefit (e.g. “It took a topologist to keep
track of the ever-changing romantic geometry of her inner circle”).
The
weight of the past, and the appeal and dangers of reinventing
oneself, comprise a third significant thematic strand. For example,
when Erno discovers that Amestris had once been a pianist, he
reflects: “It made him sad. She had never said one word to him
about this hidden career. There was no piano in their apartment,
hardly any music at all.” Later, a different character
chastises himself for not realizing that part of his history “would
not remain hidden in his past, yet its resurfacing infuriated him.”
Perhaps the most succinct statement of this idea may be: “Every
present moment was colored by the years that had come before.”
The outer surface of the Moon, with its “dust pitted by a
billion years of micrometeorite impacts,” is a perfect
environment to explore the notion of an uncannily preserved past, and
its almost asphyxiating effect on the future.
“You
know that we can never avoid the status games,” observes
Hypatia Camillesdaughter. Indeed, and John Kessel’s phenomenal
novelistic achievement, informed by years of lunar, anthropological,
and historical research, contains as much of the “wit,
ingenuity in concealing motives, and complex status games” as
Erno attributes to Persian poetry in the novel’s opening
chapter. The Moon and the Other is at times slow paced, but even then it glides gracefully through a
“ta’arof dance of question and answer, compliment and
self-deprecation,” irresistibly appealing to our intelligence
and visionary capacity as readers to delve into perennial questions
of self and existential meaning. I think it’s one of the best
science fiction novels of the last twenty years.
Title: Avengers of the Moon
Author: Allen Steele
Publisher: Tor
In
“Captain Future and the Space Emperor” (Captain Future #1,
Winter 1939/1940) Edmond Hamilton created an instantly loved
character who, along with his three indefatigable companions, the
robot Grag, the android Otho, and the brain of Professor Simon
Wright, would go on to star in twenty-six additional installments of
rip-roaring fun and galaxy-spanning adventure between 1940 and 1951.
Fast forward to 2017. Allen Steele, whose affection towards and
extensive knowledge of the history of science fiction were
demonstrated most recently in his novel Arkwright,
has gained permission from the Hamilton estate to resurrect Captain
Future. As a reader who proudly displays the
three deluxe hardcovers of Captain Future yarns recently re-issued by Haffner Press on his
shelves, the publication of Avengers of the Moon
fills me with joy.
And
along with that joy, trepidation. Would Steele do justice to Curtis
Newton, i.e. Captain Future? Would he get the voice right? How much
familiarity with Newton’s backstory would be asked of modern
readers, most of whom have probably never heard of the character?
Within a few pages of Steele’s novel, my doubts evaporated and
all concerns were allayed. This is not a continuation of the Captain
Future saga, but rather a fresh retelling of the classic origin
story, informed by current science and technology (with a few minor
concessions where necessary). I’m also happy that Steele has
decided to tell his tale in smooth, modern-day prose, as opposed to
attempting a deliberately retrograde pulp style. His writing is crisp
and clear.
Structurally,
the novel benefits from a technique that Steele also used to great
effect in Arkwright, which is to tell about a third of his present-timeline story, then go
back for an extended flashback that fleshes out the characters and
their motivations, and finally return to the present for a swift and
sweeping third act. As with so many classic space opera stories
rooted in a 40s sensibility, the main plot engine is the conflict
between the protagonist and the villain of the piece. In this
instance Curtis Newton, an orphan, seeks vengeance against criminal
entrepreneur and scheming genius Victor Corvo. Much of the novel’s
action consists of Newton tracking down his prey and overcoming
seemingly insurmountable obstacles along the way, which results in
some ingenious action sequences and a jaunt from the Moon to Mars. At
the same time, Curtis himself is being tracked by Joan Randall, an
officer of the Interplanetary Police Force. As is telegraphed early
on, she will be the novel’s main romantic interest. The
climactic confrontation with Corvo is well-handled, and a sense of
pathos lingers after turning the last page.
I
applaud Steele’s sincere but restrained approach to his source
material, and I relished his evident enjoyment in this particular
reworking, as well as the references he sprinkles in for knowing
readers (e.g. the ship Leigh Brackett).
The novel’s Prologue sets the stage for the story, imbuing it
with a “golden age” flavor from the get-go. We’re
told that “there were no heroes. Naturally, one had to be
born.” This novel tells of this hero’s birth and
upbringing and sets us up for his future adventures. The ending of
“The Triumph of Captain Future” (Captain Future #4,
Fall 1940) contains the following lines:
“It’s been a long road that we’ve roamed together, we four.”
“Aye, lad,” said the Brain. “And that road still stretches
ahead, perilous as ever. The System will need us again, you may be sure.”
It was the truth, Curt knew. Evil ambition was hydra-headed, never
completely crushed. Sooner or later its threat would cause the signal
to flash again from Earth’s pole to summon him and the Futuremen.”
I, for one, eagerly anticipate Steele responding to the flash and
penning another entry in this good-natured, sense-of-wonder series.
Read more by Alvaro Zinos-Amaro